Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Izzet Prowess | slaxx | 7-2 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 64 #12774470 |
| Izzet Prowess | hareta kaizu | 7-2 | None |
| Izzet Prowess | stefano vinci | 8-6 | None |
| Jeskai Oculus | toni portolan | 7-5 | None |
| Izzet Prowess | matej zatlkaj | 6-2 | None |
| Izzet Prowess | rintaro honda | 7-5 | None |
| Mono-Red Aggro | marco oliveto | 6-7 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Boros Burn , Gruul Aggro , Izzet Prowess , Jeskai Oculus , Mono-Red Aggro
Meta Performance Analysis
Thundering Rebuke ranks #1476 out of approximately 5129 cards in raw efficiency (top 29%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Red average: 49.2%
Performance compared to other Red cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Thundering Rebuke is a solid card that performs above average in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 2
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 7.72 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 2 mana, the average win rate in the format is 47.5%. Thundering Rebuke has a win rate of 56.6%, making it 19.1% better than other 2-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Celestus | Legendary Artifact | 7 | 68.8% | 2 |
| Malevolent Hermit | Creature — Human Wizard | 7 | 60.7% | 1 |
| Galvanic Iteration | Instant | 12 | 59.4% | 2 |
| Alrund's Epiphany | Sorcery | 14 | 59.0% | 2 |
| Divide by Zero | Instant | 14 | 58.1% | 2 |
| Lier, Disciple of the Drowned | Legendary Creature — Human Wizard | 10 | 57.8% | 2 |
| Cinderclasm | Instant | 15 | 57.7% | 2 |
| Smoldering Egg | Creature — Dragon Egg | 15 | 57.3% | 3 |
| Mascot Exhibition | Sorcery — Lesson | 16 | 56.5% | 2 |
| Environmental Sciences | Sorcery — Lesson | 15 | 56.4% | 2 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Thundering Rebuke than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Malevolent Hermit | Creature — Human Wizard | 2 | 7 | 71.8% | 57.7% | +14.1% |
| The Celestus | Legendary Artifact | 3 | 8 | 66.7% | 58.4% | +8.2% |
| Saw It Coming | Instant | 3 | 9 | 65.5% | 58.0% | +7.5% |
| Burning Hands | Instant | 2 | 15 | 65.1% | 58.8% | +6.3% |
| Memory Deluge | Instant | 4 | 7 | 61.5% | 56.4% | +5.2% |
| Galvanic Iteration | Instant | 2 | 14 | 61.2% | 56.0% | +5.2% |
| Alrund's Epiphany | Sorcery | 7 | 15 | 63.5% | 58.4% | +5.1% |
| Smoldering Egg | Creature — Dragon Egg | 2 | 16 | 63.6% | 58.6% | +5.0% |
| Fading Hope | Instant | 1 | 19 | 62.8% | 57.9% | +4.9% |
| Dragon's Fire | Instant | 2 | 7 | 62.5% | 57.9% | +4.6% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Izzet Prowess | 23 | 2.3% | 50.7% |
| Mono-Red Aggro | 9 | 2.1% | 27.3% |
| Jeskai Oculus | 6 | 0.8% | 37.9% |
| Gruul Aggro | 2 | 0.1% | 37.5% |
| Boros Burn | 1 | 0.2% | 50.0% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.